Some
of you may be aware that I just returned from a European holiday. We visited
six countries in 15 days - quite a trip! My friends and I explored several
museums, but we had what I thought was our most interesting interaction with
the docent at a small, out of the way place in Basel, Switzerland called The
Jewish Museum. The museum is so small that we almost missed it, and I had a
hard time finding its online presence as I sat to write this blog.
The
Jewish Museum is not a Holocaust museum. Instead, it chronicles the lives of
Jewish people who live in the area and shows their successes and their
diversity. There were a few artifacts from that terrible time, of course, and
as we viewed them our conversation turned to Switzerland's stance regarding
Jews during WWII. We explained to the docent (who spoke English and spent
lots of time with us) that as American school children we'd all learned that
Switzerland remained "neutral" during that war.
Our
docent (who was German and commuted to Basel for work) gave us a wry smile and
said (my paraphrase), "Yes, I guess you can say they were neutral. When
the Jews fleeing other countries came to the Swiss border they were turned
away, although the Swiss authorities certainly knew what would happen to them.
If you call that neutral, they were neutral." She went on to note that
Hitler had much money hidden in Swiss banks - "I guess that's being neutral,
too," she added.
The
purpose of this post is not to pass judgement or to make you hate Switzerland.
So before you swear off Swiss cheese (which is actually produced in the U.S.),
understand that my goal is to examine this concept of "neutrality"
and to apply it to American race relations today (you knew I would get to
that). Some of us, especially if we are white, may feel that we take a neutral
stance on issues of racial justice. We have nothing against people of color in
general. We may feel badly about racism as a general principle but be confused
as to if and how it really exists and what we can or should do about it.
Critical
race scholar and psychologist Beverly Daniel Tatum* proposed the following idea
that I think applies well to the concept of neutrality. She said there are only
three possible positions toward racism. We are either:
1.
Actively racist. I could mention some names here, but I'll stick to one we'll
all agree on - the fictional Archie Bunker (although my students have no idea
who he is). This is the person who makes racist comments, tells racists jokes,
and fits people into neat little stereotypes based on racial background. Make
no mistake, active racism is alive and well but is so politically incorrect
that you'd be hard pressed to hear it expressed in mixed circles.
2.
Passively racist. This is the "neutral" category. I'm against
racism (kind of, although I might argue that it no longer exists or that whites
are the victims of racism, too), but I don't do or say anything to speak out
against it. Maybe I'm confused (there are two sides to every story), maybe I'm
uncomfortable, maybe I just want all this unpleasantness to go away. But, like
the Swiss who turned Jews away at their borders, we can't do nothing to help and claim neutrality. Our
paralyzed position is a form of passive racism. My Christian readers might
relate this to the words of Jesus in Matthew 12:30 - "Whoever is not with me is
against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters."
3.
Actively anti-racist. Here's the one I want to be. People who are anti-racist
think deeply about racial justice and do the best they can to show their
opposition within their particular sphere of influence (again, from Tatum).
This looks different for different folks - voting, writing, teaching, talking,
not laughing at racist jokes, asking honest questions and trying to
understand a perspective other than our own.
When it
comes to family arguments, neutrality may serve you well. Keeping your car in
neutral may save your transmission stress. And when it comes to buying
carpets, neutral is always best. But when we talk about injustice, past or
present, neutrality is not the way.
*"Why
Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?" And Other
Conversations About Race, Basic Books 2003.
No comments:
Post a Comment