What does it mean to be beautiful? I’m reading Toni
Morrison’s The Bluest Eye for
probably the fourth or fifth time. Set
in the 1940s, the story centers on the internalization of white beauty
standards by African American females.
One girl in particular, Pecola, has bought into the idea that she is
ugly, partly because of the darkness of her skin and partly because of her
dysfunctional family. She tries to make herself invisible, but she just can’t
get her eyes to disappear, so she prays every night that her eyes would turn
blue. Eventually, Pecola’s
internalization of whiteness as the standard of beauty is so damaging that it
drives her to insanity. Morrison’s text is a devastating indictment of how the idea
of beauty combines with the beast of racism to psychologically damage people of
color.
During approximately the same time setting as The Bluest Eye, African Americans were fighting
for the right to an integrated public school system. Civil Rights leaders used
evidence from the now famous “doll experiments” by the Clarks that asked
African American children to choose between a white and black baby doll. Many of the children preferred the white doll
and cried or ran from the room when the experimenter asked them to “show me the
doll that looks like you.” Although people
today critique these studies, arguing that the Clarks intentionally manipulated
their results through the order of the questions, the Clarks’ findings that
African American children internalized whiteness as good and blackness as bad helped to precipitate the Brown v. Board of
Education Supreme Court decisions that finally made racial segregation in
public education illegal. Other people have conducted similar studies with
varied results, as recently shown on Anderson Cooper’s 360 report on kids and
race, which you can check out here -- AC360 Study.
Fast forward to 2012 and the Trayvon Martin killing. Was George Zimmerman racist or wasn’t he?
Does he deserve to be tried and convicted of murder, or was he acting in
self-defense? And what does this have to do with the internalization of
whiteness as the standard of beauty and goodness? Of course I don’t
know this for a fact, but I think it’s entirely possible that George Zimmerman
is not a racist in the strict, Archie Bunker sense of the word. I bet he believes in equal rights. I bet he even
has African American friends. When others stick up for him and claim he’s not
racist, I bet they are sincere. George
Zimmerman may be no more racist than I am.
Why, then, did he choose to follow Trayvon Martin that night? Why did he
assume that the African American youth was up to no good? Because, like most of
us, George Zimmerman has probably internalized the standard that white is good and
black is bad without even realizing it. These racist ideas are so woven into
our white-dominated culture that it would be hard not to internalize them. Sadly, not much has changed since Morrison
wrote her Nobel prize winning novel – ‘tis still beauty, whether inner or
outer, that feeds the beast.
I guess it'll be hard to know when such almost unrealized internal racist disappear from our society. It is hard to know the motivation of people sometimes.
ReplyDeleteZimmerman may have followed Martin around because of the behavior he was exhibiting or maybe just because he was black. A shame there are no witnesses.
My point is that we're all affected by the internalization of whiteness as the standard of beauty and goodness. You don't have to be overtly racist for that to be true. Witness or no witness, this is the motivation of Zimmerman's following Martin.
ReplyDelete